Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages

2013-06-09 Thread Gleb Natapov
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 05:06:24PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > On 06/09/2013 04:53 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:36:19AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > >> Hi Gleb, Paolo, Marcelo, > >> > >> I have putted the potential controversial patches to the latter that are > >> pat

Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages

2013-06-09 Thread Xiao Guangrong
On 06/09/2013 04:53 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:36:19AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: >> Hi Gleb, Paolo, Marcelo, >> >> I have putted the potential controversial patches to the latter that are >> patch 8 ~ 10, patch 11 depends on patch 9. Other patches are fully reviewed, >>

Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages

2013-06-09 Thread Gleb Natapov
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:36:19AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > Hi Gleb, Paolo, Marcelo, > > I have putted the potential controversial patches to the latter that are > patch 8 ~ 10, patch 11 depends on patch 9. Other patches are fully reviewed, > I think its are ready for being merged. If not lu

Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages

2013-06-05 Thread Gleb Natapov
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:36:19AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > Hi Gleb, Paolo, Marcelo, > > I have putted the potential controversial patches to the latter that are > patch 8 ~ 10, patch 11 depends on patch 9. Other patches are fully reviewed, > I think its are ready for being merged. If not lu

Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages

2013-06-05 Thread Gleb Natapov
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:26:01PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:36:19AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > > Hi Gleb, Paolo, Marcelo, > > > > I have putted the potential controversial patches to the latter that are > > patch 8 ~ 10, patch 11 depends on patch 9. Other patc

Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] KVM: MMU: fast zap all shadow pages

2013-06-04 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 08:36:19AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote: > Hi Gleb, Paolo, Marcelo, > > I have putted the potential controversial patches to the latter that are > patch 8 ~ 10, patch 11 depends on patch 9. Other patches are fully reviewed, > I think its are ready for being merged. If not lu