On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 4:54 PM, Andreas Grünbacher
wrote:
> 2015-09-28 19:46 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields :
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 07:10:06PM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
>>> 2015-09-28 18:35 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields :
>>> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrot
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:26:09PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>>> And any disk filesystems that have their own non-POSIX ACLs, such as HFS,
>>> NTFS, ZFS would presumably al
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:26:09PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>> And any disk filesystems that have their own non-POSIX ACLs, such as HFS,
>> NTFS, ZFS would presumably also need to map the in-kernel Richacl format to
>> their on-disk
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 02:26:09PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> And any disk filesystems that have their own non-POSIX ACLs, such as HFS,
> NTFS, ZFS would presumably also need to map the in-kernel Richacl format to
> their on-disk format.
No, we did this mistake with Posix ACLs, and we're not
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Oct 6, 2015, at 7:12 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Christoph Hellwig
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 02:58:36PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
I think the point is that a new VFS fea
On Oct 6, 2015, at 7:12 AM, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 02:58:36PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>>> I think the point is that a new VFS feature that is easy to integrate in
>>> multiple filesystems shoul
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 02:58:36PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
>> I think the point is that a new VFS feature that is easy to integrate in
>> multiple filesystems should have support for those filesystems. A decade
>> ago, just hav
2015-10-06 11:49 GMT+02:00 James Morris :
> Where is the rationale for them?
>
> This url doesn't work: http://acl.bestbits.at/richacl/
That URL also properly redirects to http://www.bestbits.at/richacl/
now. There is some information on that website, in the manual pages in
the richacl user-space
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 02:58:36PM -0400, Austin S Hemmelgarn wrote:
> I think the point is that a new VFS feature that is easy to integrate in
> multiple filesystems should have support for those filesystems. A decade
> ago, just having ext* support would probably have been fine, but these days,
On Sat, 3 Oct 2015, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > here's another update of the richacl patch queue. At this stage, I would
> > like to ask for final feedback so that the core and ext4 code (patches
> > 1-19) can
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:01:19AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:45:40PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> >> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Christoph Hellwig
> >> wrote:
> >> > After that the wire up sh
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:17 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:45:40PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > After that the wire up should be so trivial that you can wire up btrfs,
>> > xfs and f2fs as well, which is
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:45:40PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> here's another update of the richacl patch queue. At this stage, I would
>
On 2015-10-05 14:45, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
Hello,
here's another update of the richacl patch queue. At this stage, I would
like to ask for final feedback so that
On Sun, Oct 4, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> here's another update of the richacl patch queue. At this stage, I would
>> like to ask for final feedback so that the core and ext4 code (patches
>> 1-1
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here's another update of the richacl patch queue. At this stage, I would
> like to ask for final feedback so that the core and ext4 code (patches
> 1-19) can be merged in the 4.4 merge window. The nfsd and nfs code
2015-09-28 19:46 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields :
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 07:10:06PM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
>> 2015-09-28 18:35 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields :
>> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> >> Open issues in nfs:
>> >>
>> >> * When a user or group n
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 07:10:06PM +0200, Andreas Grünbacher wrote:
> 2015-09-28 18:35 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields :
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> >> Open issues in nfs:
> >>
> >> * When a user or group name cannot be mapped, nfs's idmapper always maps it
2015-09-28 18:35 GMT+02:00 J. Bruce Fields :
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
>> here's another update of the richacl patch queue. At this stage, I would
>> like to ask for final feedback so that the core and ext4 code (patches
>> 1-19) can be merged in the 4.
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 12:08:51AM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> here's another update of the richacl patch queue. At this stage, I would
> like to ask for final feedback so that the core and ext4 code (patches
> 1-19) can be merged in the 4.4 merge window. The nfsd and nfs code should
> th
20 matches
Mail list logo
