On Thu, 2017-08-31 at 11:51 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:04:18PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Thank you! Is it necessary for me to submit a v9 with these updates?
> > Perhaps I can make these updates in branch for the maintainers to pull
> > when/if this series is ac
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 09:04:18PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Thank you! Is it necessary for me to submit a v9 with these updates?
> Perhaps I can make these updates in branch for the maintainers to pull
> when/if this series is ack'ed.
Don't do anything and let me go through the rest of them fi
On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 19:41 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
Thanks Borislav for your feedback!
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 05:27:43PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> > Both head_32.S and head_64.S utilize the same value to initialize the
> > control register CR0. Also, other parts of the kernel might wa
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 05:27:43PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Both head_32.S and head_64.S utilize the same value to initialize the
> control register CR0. Also, other parts of the kernel might want to access
> to this initial definition (e.g., emulation code for User-Mode Instruction
s/to //
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
