Hi,
On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Raju P L S S S N
wrote:
>>> + break;
>>
>>
>> "break" seems wrong here. You'll end up waiting for the completion,
>> then I guess timing out, then returning -ETIMEDOUT?
>
>
> As the loop above break runs for remaining count, completion w
Hi,
will reply on points other than what Lina has responded.
On 5/12/2018 1:49 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
/**
@@ -77,12 +82,14 @@ struct rpmh_request {
* @cache: the list of cached requests
* @lock: synchronize access to the control
Hi,
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 11:03 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
>>> Also, the bus requests have quite a churn during the course of an
>>> usecase. They are setup and invalidated often.
>>> It is faster to have them separate and invalidate the whole lot of the
>>> batch_cache instead of intertwining them w
On Tue, May 15 2018 at 10:50 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
On Tue, May 15 2018 at 09:52 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Lina Iyer wrote:
/**
@@ -77,12 +82,14 @@ struct rpmh_request {
* @cache: the li
Hi,
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 9:23 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 15 2018 at 09:52 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Lina Iyer wrote:
>>
> /**
> @@ -77,12 +82,14 @@ struct rpmh_request {
> * @cache: the list of cached requests
>
On Tue, May 15 2018 at 09:52 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Lina Iyer wrote:
/**
@@ -77,12 +82,14 @@ struct rpmh_request {
* @cache: the list of cached requests
* @lock: synchronize access to the controller data
* @dirty: was the cache updated since f
Hi,
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Lina Iyer wrote:
>>> /**
>>> @@ -77,12 +82,14 @@ struct rpmh_request {
>>> * @cache: the list of cached requests
>>> * @lock: synchronize access to the controller data
>>> * @dirty: was the cache updated since flush
>>> + * @batch_cache: Cache sleep a
Hi Doug,
Will explain only the key points now.
On Fri, May 11 2018 at 14:19 -0600, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
/**
@@ -77,12 +82,14 @@ struct rpmh_request {
* @cache: the list of cached requests
* @lock: synchronize access to the controlle
Hi,
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:01 AM, Lina Iyer wrote:
> /**
> @@ -77,12 +82,14 @@ struct rpmh_request {
> * @cache: the list of cached requests
> * @lock: synchronize access to the controller data
> * @dirty: was the cache updated since flush
> + * @batch_cache: Cache sleep and wake reques
On Wed, May 09 2018 at 16:03 -0600, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 11:01:58AM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
Platform drivers need make a lot of resource state requests at the same
time, say, at the start or end of an usecase. It can be quite
inefficient to send each request separatel
On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 11:01:58AM -0600, Lina Iyer wrote:
> Platform drivers need make a lot of resource state requests at the same
> time, say, at the start or end of an usecase. It can be quite
> inefficient to send each request separately. Instead they can give the
> RPMH library a batch of req
11 matches
Mail list logo
