2015-05-19 16:50 GMT+02:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
>
> config CLKSRC_STM32
> bool "Clocksource for STM32 SoCs" if COMPILE_TEST
> depends on OF
> select CLKSRC_MMIO
>
> This permits CLKSRC_STM32 to be selected by STM32 (provided OF is enabled,
> it's always going to be for
On 05/19/2015 04:41 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
2015-05-19 15:49 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
It is not exactly as the initial patch.
I think Arnd is proposing:
config CLKSRC_STM32
bool "Clocksource for STM32 SoCs" if COMPILE_TEST
select CLKSRC_MMIO
Isn't "depends on OF" mi
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 04:41:58PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 2015-05-19 15:49 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
> >
> >
> > It is not exactly as the initial patch.
> >
> > I think Arnd is proposing:
> >
> > config CLKSRC_STM32
> > bool "Clocksource for STM32 SoCs" if COMPILE_TEST
> >
On Tuesday 19 May 2015 15:49:52 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/19/2015 03:42 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> > 2015-05-19 12:55 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann :
> >> Please also make it possible to select this driver on other architectures
> >> with COMPILE_TEST, so we get coverage from all the x86 test infra
2015-05-19 15:49 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
>
>
> It is not exactly as the initial patch.
>
> I think Arnd is proposing:
>
> config CLKSRC_STM32
> bool "Clocksource for STM32 SoCs" if COMPILE_TEST
> select CLKSRC_MMIO
>
Isn't "depends on OF" missing for COMPILE_TEST case?
Other th
On 05/19/2015 03:42 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
2015-05-19 12:55 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann :
Please also make it possible to select this driver on other architectures
with COMPILE_TEST, so we get coverage from all the x86 test infrastructure.
You proposal is to revert back to the original patch,
2015-05-19 12:55 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann :
> Please also make it possible to select this driver on other architectures
> with COMPILE_TEST, so we get coverage from all the x86 test infrastructure.
You proposal is to revert back to the original patch, except that
ARCH_STM32 should select CLKSRC_STM
2015-05-19 15:00 GMT+02:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:56:43PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Folks, can you please trim your replies. It's a PITA to scroll down
>> through several pages to find a single line of content.
>
> Absolutely right. Too many people do not do
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:56:43PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 19 May 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> > 2015-05-19 11:59 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
> > >> Is the below Kconfig entry fine for you?
> > >>
> > >> config CLKSRC_STM32
> > >> def_bool y if ARCH_STM32
> > >> select CL
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 2015-05-19 11:59 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
> >> Is the below Kconfig entry fine for you?
> >>
> >> config CLKSRC_STM32
> >> def_bool y if ARCH_STM32
> >> select CLKSRC_MMIO
> >
> >
> > config CLKSRC_STM32
> > bool
> > select C
On Tuesday 19 May 2015 12:02:59 Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> >
> > config CLKSRC_STM32
> > bool
> > select CLKSRC_MMIO
> >
> > and in the arch/arm/mach-stm32/Kconfig add select CLKSRC_STM32
>
> Ok, I will send a patch for arch/arm/Kconfig, as Arnd already applied
> the one intruducing
2015-05-19 11:59 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
> On 05/19/2015 11:44 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>> 2015-05-19 11:06 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
>>>
>>> On 05/19/2015 10:55 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
2015-05-19 10:16 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
>
>
> On 05/18/2015 04:03 PM,
On 05/19/2015 11:44 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
2015-05-19 11:06 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
On 05/19/2015 10:55 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
2015-05-19 10:16 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
On 05/18/2015 04:03 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
2015-05-18 15:10 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
On 05/09/2015
2015-05-19 11:06 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
> On 05/19/2015 10:55 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>> 2015-05-19 10:16 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
>>>
>>> On 05/18/2015 04:03 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
2015-05-18 15:10 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
>
>
> On 05/09/2015 09:53 AM,
On 05/19/2015 10:55 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
2015-05-19 10:16 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
On 05/18/2015 04:03 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
2015-05-18 15:10 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
On 05/09/2015 09:53 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
STM32 MCUs feature 16 and 32 bits general purpose timers wit
2015-05-19 10:16 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
> On 05/18/2015 04:03 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>> 2015-05-18 15:10 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
>>>
>>> On 05/09/2015 09:53 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
STM32 MCUs feature 16 and 32 bits general purpose timers with
prescalers.
Th
On 05/18/2015 04:03 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
2015-05-18 15:10 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
On 05/09/2015 09:53 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
STM32 MCUs feature 16 and 32 bits general purpose timers with prescalers.
The drivers detects whether the time is 16 or 32 bits, and applies a
1024 prescale
2015-05-18 15:10 GMT+02:00 Daniel Lezcano :
> On 05/09/2015 09:53 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>> STM32 MCUs feature 16 and 32 bits general purpose timers with prescalers.
>> The drivers detects whether the time is 16 or 32 bits, and applies a
>> 1024 prescaler value if it is 16 bits.
>>
>> Review
On 05/09/2015 09:53 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
STM32 MCUs feature 16 and 32 bits general purpose timers with prescalers.
The drivers detects whether the time is 16 or 32 bits, and applies a
1024 prescaler value if it is 16 bits.
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij
Tested-by: Chanwoo Choi
Signed-off-by:
19 matches
Mail list logo
