On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 04:15:58AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Catalin Marinas
> wrote:
> > From b32606aa3997fc8a45014a64f99e921eef4872b0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Catalin Marinas
> > Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:20:01 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] pci: Add
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Catalin Marinas
wrote:
> ...
> Some more thinking, so I guess we could get away without changing the
> API. On top of Liviu's tree here:
>
> http://linux-arm.org/git?p=linux-ld.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for-upstream/pci_v8
>
> I reverted "pci: Introduce a domain
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 07:02:06PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 06:02:56PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Catalin Marinas
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:36:10PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > >> Most of the rest of the v7 d
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 06:02:56PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Catalin Marinas
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:36:10PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> Most of the rest of the v7 discussion was about "Introduce a domain
> >> number for pci_host_bridge."
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Catalin Marinas
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:36:10PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> Most of the rest of the v7 discussion was about "Introduce a domain
>> number for pci_host_bridge." I think we should add arm64 using the
>> existing pci_scan_root_bus() and
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 04:08:23PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:11:16PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:36:10PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > Most of the rest of the v7 discussion was about "Introduce a domain
> > > number for pci_host_brid
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 03:11:16PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:36:10PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Most of the rest of the v7 discussion was about "Introduce a domain
> > number for pci_host_bridge." I think we should add arm64 using the
> > existing pci_scan_roo
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:36:10PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> Most of the rest of the v7 discussion was about "Introduce a domain
> number for pci_host_bridge." I think we should add arm64 using the
> existing pci_scan_root_bus() and keep the domain number in the arm64
> sysdata structure like
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 11:36:10PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>
> > I don't see a way out of adding new PCI interfaces if we want to have
> > support in
> > the PCI framework for unifying existing architectures. Of course, there is
> > the
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 3:47 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> I don't see a way out of adding new PCI interfaces if we want to have support
> in
> the PCI framework for unifying existing architectures. Of course, there is
> the painful
> alternative of changing the existing APIs and fixing arches in on
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 04:10:04PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 07:41:50PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Bjorn Hel
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 07:41:50PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>
>> >> I wonder if it would help to make a weak pci_domai
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 07:41:50PM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> >> I wonder if it would help to make a weak pci_domain_nr() function that
> >> returns "bridge->domain_nr". T
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> I wonder if it would help to make a weak pci_domain_nr() function that
>> returns "bridge->domain_nr". Then each arch could individually drop its
>> pci_domain_nr() definition a
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 01:59:54AM +0100, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:43:31PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > Make it easier to discover the domain number of a bus by storing
> > the number in pci_host_bridge for the root bus. Several architectures
> > have their own way of stor
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 07:43:31PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> Make it easier to discover the domain number of a bus by storing
> the number in pci_host_bridge for the root bus. Several architectures
> have their own way of storing this information, so it makes sense
> to try to unify the code. Whi
16 matches
Mail list logo
