On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 09:28:33AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Oh, it's pretty much 100%.
Oh good.
> I can't imagine what would make me skip an rc8 at this point.
> Everything looks good right now (but not rc7, we had a stupid bug),
> but I'd rather wait a week than fins another silly bug the
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:24 AM Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> Ok, I'll try to queue them but pls respin soonish. That is, if Linus
> cuts -rc8 we have plenty of time but he didn't sound 100% on the -rc8
> thing.
Oh, it's pretty much 100%.
I can't imagine what would make me skip an rc8 at this point
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 08:49:42AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> There's been a paucity of response on these after converging on the
> feedback from Linus. They missed v5.9, and I started casting about for
> what could be done to make sure they did not also miss v5.10 if the
> quiet continued. The p
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:05 PM Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:32:07PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > Given that Linus was the primary source of review feedback on these
> > patches and a version of them have been soaking in -next with only a
> > minor conflict report with
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 03:32:07PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Given that Linus was the primary source of review feedback on these
> patches and a version of them have been soaking in -next with only a
> minor conflict report with vfs.git for the entirety of the v5.9-rc
> cycle (left there inadver
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:00 AM Dan Williams wrote:
>
> Changes since v8 [1]:
> - Rebase on v5.9-rc6
>
> - Fix a performance regression in the x86 copy_mc_to_user()
> implementation that was duplicating copies in the "fragile" case.
>
> - Refreshed the cover letter.
>
> [1]:
> http://lore.kern
6 matches
Mail list logo
