On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 6:06 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 11:03:57AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 05:45:47PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > I tried merging with clang-cfi Git which is based on Linux v5.11-rc2+
> > > with a lot of merge conflicts.
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 6:06 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 11:03:57AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 05:45:47PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > I tried merging with clang-cfi Git which is based on Linux v5.11-rc2+
> > > with a lot of merge conflicts.
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 11:03:57AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 05:45:47PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > I tried merging with clang-cfi Git which is based on Linux v5.11-rc2+
> > with a lot of merge conflicts.
> >
> > Did you try on top of cfi-10 Git tag which is based on
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 05:45:47PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> I tried merging with clang-cfi Git which is based on Linux v5.11-rc2+
> with a lot of merge conflicts.
>
> Did you try on top of cfi-10 Git tag which is based on Linux v5.10?
>
> Whatever you successfully did... Can you give me a step
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 5:33 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> > > > Did you push it (oh ah push it push it really really really good...)
> > > > to your remote Git please :-).
> > >
> > > I thought I already pushed it pretty good ;-) do you not see it?
> > >
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/ker
> > > Did you push it (oh ah push it push it really really really good...)
> > > to your remote Git please :-).
> >
> > I thought I already pushed it pretty good ;-) do you not see it?
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jpoimboe/linux.git
> > objtool-vmlinux
> >
> > d6baee244f2d
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 5:07 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 04:46:21PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:36 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > > I am interested in having Clang LTO (Clan
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 04:46:21PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:36 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > > I am interested in having Clang LTO (Clang-CFI) for x86-64 working and
> > > help with testing.
> > >
> > >
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:36 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > I am interested in having Clang LTO (Clang-CFI) for x86-64 working and
> > help with testing.
> >
> > I tried the Git tree mentioned in [3]
> > (together with changes from ).
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 03:54:20PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> I am interested in having Clang LTO (Clang-CFI) for x86-64 working and
> help with testing.
>
> I tried the Git tree mentioned in [3]
> (together with changes from ).
>
> I only see in my build-log...
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i9
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 7:46 PM 'Sami Tolvanen' via Clang Built Linux
wrote:
>
> This patch series adds support for building the kernel with Clang's
> Link Time Optimization (LTO). In addition to performance, the primary
> motivation for LTO is to allow Clang's Control-Flow Integrity (CFI)
> to be
On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 10:46:17 -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> This patch series adds support for building the kernel with Clang's
> Link Time Optimization (LTO). In addition to performance, the primary
> motivation for LTO is to allow Clang's Control-Flow Integrity (CFI)
> to be used in the kernel. Go
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:46:17AM -0800, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> This patch series adds support for building the kernel with Clang's
> Link Time Optimization (LTO). In addition to performance, the primary
> motivation for LTO is to allow Clang's Control-Flow Integrity (CFI)
> to be used in the kern
13 matches
Mail list logo
