Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-31 Thread Steven Price
On 31/07/2019 10:27, Sven Schnelle wrote: > Hi Steven, > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Steven Price wrote: >> >> parisc is more interesting and I'm not sure if this is necessarily >> correct. I originally proposed a patch with the line "For parisc, we >> don't support large pages, so

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-31 Thread Sven Schnelle
Hi Steven, On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 12:32:25PM +0100, Steven Price wrote: > > parisc is more interesting and I'm not sure if this is necessarily > correct. I originally proposed a patch with the line "For parisc, we > don't support large pages, so add stubs returning 0" which got Acked by > Helge

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-29 Thread Steven Price
On 28/07/2019 12:20, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 07/22/2019 09:11 PM, Steven Price wrote: >> Steven Price (21): >> arc: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions >> arm: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions >> arm64: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions >> mips: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions >> powerpc: mm:

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-28 Thread Anshuman Khandual
On 07/22/2019 09:11 PM, Steven Price wrote: > Steven Price (21): > arc: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions > arm: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions > arm64: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions > mips: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions > powerpc: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions > riscv: mm: Add p?d_leaf

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-25 Thread Anshuman Khandual
On 07/25/2019 03:00 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 02:39:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> On 07/24/2019 07:05 PM, Steven Price wrote: >>> There isn't any problem as such with using p?d_large macros. However the >>> name "large" has caused confusion in the past. In partic

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-25 Thread Steven Price
On 25/07/2019 10:09, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > > > On 07/24/2019 07:05 PM, Steven Price wrote: >> On 23/07/2019 07:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>> Hello Steven, >>> >>> On 07/22/2019 09:11 PM, Steven Price wrote: This is a slight reworking and extension of my previous patch set (Conve

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-25 Thread Will Deacon
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 02:39:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > On 07/24/2019 07:05 PM, Steven Price wrote: > > There isn't any problem as such with using p?d_large macros. However the > > name "large" has caused confusion in the past. In particular there are > > two types of "large" page: > >

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-25 Thread Anshuman Khandual
On 07/24/2019 07:05 PM, Steven Price wrote: > On 23/07/2019 07:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >> Hello Steven, >> >> On 07/22/2019 09:11 PM, Steven Price wrote: >>> This is a slight reworking and extension of my previous patch set >>> (Convert x86 & arm64 to use generic page walk), but I've contin

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-24 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Steven Price wrote: > On 24/07/2019 14:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > From your 14/N changelog: > > > >> This keeps the output shorter and will help with a future change > > > > I don't care about shorter at all. It's debug information. > > Sorry, the "shorter" part was beca

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-24 Thread Steven Price
On 24/07/2019 14:57, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Steven Price wrote: >> On 23/07/2019 11:16, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> Are there any visible changes to the arm64 output? >> >> arm64 output shouldn't change. I've confirmed that "efi_page_tables" is >> identical on a Juno before/after

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-24 Thread Mark Rutland
On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 03:57:33PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Steven Price wrote: > > On 23/07/2019 11:16, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > Are there any visible changes to the arm64 output? > > > > arm64 output shouldn't change. I've confirmed that "efi_page_tables" is > > iden

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-24 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 24 Jul 2019, Steven Price wrote: > On 23/07/2019 11:16, Mark Rutland wrote: > > Are there any visible changes to the arm64 output? > > arm64 output shouldn't change. I've confirmed that "efi_page_tables" is > identical on a Juno before/after the change. "kernel_page_tables" > obviously wil

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-24 Thread Steven Price
On 23/07/2019 11:16, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:41:49PM +0100, Steven Price wrote: >> This is a slight reworking and extension of my previous patch set >> (Convert x86 & arm64 to use generic page walk), but I've continued the >> version numbering as most of the changes are the

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-24 Thread Steven Price
On 23/07/2019 07:39, Anshuman Khandual wrote: > Hello Steven, > > On 07/22/2019 09:11 PM, Steven Price wrote: >> This is a slight reworking and extension of my previous patch set >> (Convert x86 & arm64 to use generic page walk), but I've continued the >> version numbering as most of the changes a

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-23 Thread Mark Rutland
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 04:41:49PM +0100, Steven Price wrote: > This is a slight reworking and extension of my previous patch set > (Convert x86 & arm64 to use generic page walk), but I've continued the > version numbering as most of the changes are the same. In particular > this series ends with a

Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] Generic page walk and ptdump

2019-07-22 Thread Anshuman Khandual
Hello Steven, On 07/22/2019 09:11 PM, Steven Price wrote: > This is a slight reworking and extension of my previous patch set > (Convert x86 & arm64 to use generic page walk), but I've continued the > version numbering as most of the changes are the same. In particular > this series ends with a ge