Re: [PATCHv3 03/10] ARM: smp_twd: Divorce smp_twd from local timer API

2013-04-02 Thread Mark Rutland
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:09:31PM +, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 03/28/13 08:22, Mark Rutland wrote: > > This works on my A9x4 coretile, bringing CPUs up and down via > > /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/online, so: > > > > Tested-by: Mark Rutland > > Thanks. I still need to resolve patch #1 though. >

Re: [PATCHv3 03/10] ARM: smp_twd: Divorce smp_twd from local timer API

2013-03-28 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 03/28/13 08:22, Mark Rutland wrote: > This works on my A9x4 coretile, bringing CPUs up and down via > /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/online, so: > > Tested-by: Mark Rutland Thanks. I still need to resolve patch #1 though. > > Otherwise, is there any reason we couldn't now use the twd driver on a U

Re: [PATCHv3 03/10] ARM: smp_twd: Divorce smp_twd from local timer API

2013-03-28 Thread Mark Rutland
This works on my A9x4 coretile, bringing CPUs up and down via /sys/devices/system/cpu/*/online, so: Tested-by: Mark Rutland Otherwise, is there any reason we couldn't now use the twd driver on a UP system? Or would the overhead of handling frequency change make this pointless? On Wed, Mar 13, 2