On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:10 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 09/26/2013 02:33 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 26, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/26/2013 11:05 AM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
On 9/26/2013 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq
On 09/26/2013 02:33 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Sep 26, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>
>> On 9/26/2013 11:05 AM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>>> On 9/26/2013 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts @@ -0,0
+1,6 @@ +/include/ "qcom-m
On Sep 26, 2013, at 3:58 PM, David Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:33:53PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
>>> "ePAPR 1.1 section 2.2.1.1 "Node Name Requirements" specifies that any
>>> node that has a reg property must include a unit address in its name
>>> with value matching the first en
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 02:33:53PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
"ePAPR 1.1 section 2.2.1.1 "Node Name Requirements" specifies that any
node that has a reg property must include a unit address in its name
with value matching the first entry in its reg property. Conversely, if
a node does not have a r
On Sep 26, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
> On 9/26/2013 11:05 AM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>> On 9/26/2013 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
>>> +/include/ "qcom-msm8974.dtsi"
>>> +
>>> +/ {
>>> +model = "Qual
On 9/26/2013 11:05 AM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
On 9/26/2013 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+/include/ "qcom-msm8974.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+model = "Qualcomm APQ8074 Dragonboard";
+compatible = "qcom,apq8074-dragonboard", "qcom,apq8
On 9/26/2013 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8074-dragonboard.dts
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+/include/ "qcom-msm8974.dtsi"
+
+/ {
+ model = "Qualcomm APQ8074 Dragonboard";
+ compatible = "qcom,apq8074-dragonboard", "qcom,apq8074";
+};
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dt
On Sep 25, 2013, at 5:35 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
> On 9/25/2013 12:49 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>> On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:13 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
>>
>>> This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
>>> which belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family.
>>> For now, just support a basic
On 9/25/2013 12:49 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:13 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
which belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family.
For now, just support a basic machine with device tree.
Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani
---
arch/arm
On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:13 PM, Rohit Vaswani wrote:
> This patch adds basic board support for APQ8074 Dragonboard
> which belongs to the Snapdragon 800 family.
> For now, just support a basic machine with device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rohit Vaswani
> ---
> arch/arm/Kconfig.debug
10 matches
Mail list logo