Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.9

2016-10-08 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Fri, Oct 07, 2016 at 02:17:20PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > here is the 4.9 pull request from I2C including: > > Would you mind double-checking my merge. > > It looked very trivial, but it would be good to have somebody else > giv

Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.9

2016-10-07 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > here is the 4.9 pull request from I2C including: Would you mind double-checking my merge. It looked very trivial, but it would be good to have somebody else give that gpio-pca953x.c conflict a look to verify that I didn't screw up the 'id'

Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.9

2016-10-07 Thread Wolfram Sang
> I see you didn't pick up the follow-up patch ("gpio: pca953x: add a > comment explaining the need for a lockdep subclass"). Linus acked it This was planned for the following pull request. Didn't want to change what was successfully in linux-next for a while. signature.asc Description: PGP si

Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c for 4.9

2016-10-07 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
2016-10-07 11:32 GMT+02:00 Wolfram Sang : > Linus, > > here is the 4.9 pull request from I2C including: > > * centralized error messages when registering to the core > * improved lockdep annotations to prevent false positives > * DT support for muxes, gates, and arbitrators > * bus speeds can now b