Re: [REPORT] 2.6.21.1 vs 2.6.21-sd046 vs 2.6.21-cfs-v6

2007-05-03 Thread Michael Gerdau
> regarding the fairness of the different schedulers, please note the > different runtimes for each component of the workload: > > LTMM: 5655.07/ 5682 > LTMB: 7729.81/ 7755 > LTBM: 7720.70/ 7746 > > this means that a fair scheduler would _not_ be the one that finishes > the

Re: [REPORT] 2.6.21.1 vs 2.6.21-sd046 vs 2.6.21-cfs-v6

2007-05-03 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Michael Gerdau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There are 3 scenarios: > j1 - all 3 tasks run sequentially >/proc/sys/kernel/sched_granularity_ns=400 >/proc/sys/kernel/rr_interval=16 > j3 - all 3 tasks run in parallel >/proc/sys/kernel/sched_granularity_ns=40