On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 11:24:18AM +0900, Jongsung Kim wrote:
> Thank you for your comments, Russell. I'll happily apply your recommendation
> just after it come up to the merge window. Or, do you want me to send it by
> now?
Sorry, don't understand what you're asking, could you rephrase please?
-
PM
To: Jongsung Kim
Cc: gre...@linuxfoundation.org; jsl...@suse.cz; linux-ser...@vger.kernel.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH] ARM: PL011: add support for extended FIFO-size of
PL011-r1p5
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:45:25PM +0900, Jongsung Kim wrote:
> The latest r1p5-revisio
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 03:31:39PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> static struct amba_id pl011_ids[] = {
> {
> .id = 0x00341011,
> .mask = 0x00ff,
> .data = &vendor_arm_deepfifo,
> },
> (...)
> };
>
> As you can see in amba_
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Jongsung Kim wrote:
At the risk to re-stating what Russell has already said...
> +
> + unsigned int (*get_fifosize)(unsigned int periphid);
> };
>
> +static unsigned int get_fifosize_arm(unsigned int periphid)
> +{
> + unsigned int rev = (periphid >>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:45:25PM +0900, Jongsung Kim wrote:
> The latest r1p5-revision of the ARM PL011 UART has 32-byte FIFOs,
> while all earlier ones have 16-byte FIFOs. This patch suggests
> a way to set the FIFO-size correctly & flexibly by using a member
> function named get_fifosize, rathe
5 matches
Mail list logo
