On Thu, 2020-08-27 at 20:27 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2020-08-27 06:31, Yong Wu wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 16:56 +0800, Miles Chen wrote:
> >> In previous discussion [1] and [2], we found that it is risky to
> >> use max_pfn or totalram_pages to tell if 4GB mode is enabled.
> >>
> >> Ch
On 2020-08-27 06:31, Yong Wu wrote:
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 16:56 +0800, Miles Chen wrote:
In previous discussion [1] and [2], we found that it is risky to
use max_pfn or totalram_pages to tell if 4GB mode is enabled.
Check 4GB mode by reading infracfg register, remove the usage
of the un-exporte
On 26/08/2020 10:56, Miles Chen wrote:
In previous discussion [1] and [2], we found that it is risky to
use max_pfn or totalram_pages to tell if 4GB mode is enabled.
Check 4GB mode by reading infracfg register, remove the usage
of the un-exported symbol max_pfn.
This is a step towards buildi
On Wed, 2020-08-26 at 16:56 +0800, Miles Chen wrote:
> In previous discussion [1] and [2], we found that it is risky to
> use max_pfn or totalram_pages to tell if 4GB mode is enabled.
>
> Check 4GB mode by reading infracfg register, remove the usage
> of the un-exported symbol max_pfn.
>
> This i
4 matches
Mail list logo
