On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 14:15 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Daniel wrote this bit, but I tend to agree with him, but can't give his
> rationale. Mine is that worklets are typically asynchonous and thus its
> prio should not depend on temporal things like boosting.
>
> OTOH it would probably make s
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 08:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> --
>
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 5B>
> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/workqueue.c
> > ===
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/workqueue.c
> > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/work
--
On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
5B>
> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/workqueue.c
> ===
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct cpu_workqueue_struct {
>
> spin
3 matches
Mail list logo