Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] rt: PI-workqueue support

2007-10-22 Thread Daniel Walker
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 14:15 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Daniel wrote this bit, but I tend to agree with him, but can't give his > rationale. Mine is that worklets are typically asynchonous and thus its > prio should not depend on temporal things like boosting. > > OTOH it would probably make s

Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] rt: PI-workqueue support

2007-10-22 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 08:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > -- > > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > 5B> > > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/workqueue.c > > === > > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/workqueue.c > > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/work

Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] rt: PI-workqueue support

2007-10-22 Thread Steven Rostedt
-- On Mon, 22 Oct 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote: 5B> > Index: linux-2.6/kernel/workqueue.c > === > --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/workqueue.c > +++ linux-2.6/kernel/workqueue.c > @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ struct cpu_workqueue_struct { > > spin