On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:55:00PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> Hmm, wouldn't it be nice if they put spell checker in GCC? ;)
Isn't the resulting beast called "emacs"?
--
Ryan Anderson
sometimes Pug Majere
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
On Sunday 06 February 2005 04:27, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt
> > is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow
> > properly synchronize with the beginning of the packet as mouse is supposed
>
On Sunday 06 February 2005 03:37, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:23:48AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > Ok, here is the patch using PSMOUSE_CMD_POLL. Seems to work fine with 2
> > external mice that I have and my touchpad in PS/2 compatibility mode.
> >
> > Unfortunately
Hi!
> The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt
> is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow
> properly synchronize with the beginning of the packet as mouse is supposed
> to resend entire package.
+* This is second er
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 02:23:48AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Ok, here is the patch using PSMOUSE_CMD_POLL. Seems to work fine with 2
> external mice that I have and my touchpad in PS/2 compatibility mode.
>
> Unfortunately POLL command kicks Synaptics out of absolute mode so I
> disabled al
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 12:29:20AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Saturday 05 February 2005 16:11, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:48:56PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt
> > > i
On Sunday 06 February 2005 00:29, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Saturday 05 February 2005 16:11, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:48:56PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt
> > > is delaye
On Saturday 05 February 2005 16:11, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:48:56PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt
> > is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow
> > p
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 02:48:56PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The patch below attempts to better handle situation when psmouse interrupt
> is delayed for more than 0.5 sec by requesting a resend. This will allow
> properly synchronize with the beginning of the packet as mouse is suppo
9 matches
Mail list logo
