On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 11:44:04AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:28:34 +0200
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > With the introduction of the context switch preempt_count invariant,
> > and the demise of PREEMPT_ACTIVE, its pointless to save/restore the
> > per-cpu preemption co
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:28:34 +0200
Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> With the introduction of the context switch preempt_count invariant,
> and the demise of PREEMPT_ACTIVE, its pointless to save/restore the
> per-cpu preemption count, it must always be 2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
Shoul
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> With the introduction of the context switch preempt_count invariant,
> and the demise of PREEMPT_ACTIVE, its pointless to save/restore the
> per-cpu preemption count, it must always be 2.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
3 matches
Mail list logo