On 14/06/16 14:32, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 01:08:13PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > + postunlock = rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wake_q);
> > >
> > > /*
> > >* First unlock HB so the waiter does not spin on it once he got woken
> > > + * up. Then wake
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 01:08:13PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > + postunlock = rt_mutex_futex_unlock(&pi_state->pi_mutex, &wake_q);
> >
> > /*
> > * First unlock HB so the waiter does not spin on it once he got woken
> > +* up. Then wakeup the waiter by calling rt_mutex_postunlock(
Hi,
On 07/06/16 21:56, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Previous patches changed the meaning of the return value of
> rt_mutex_slowunlock(); update comments and code to reflect this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
> ---
> kernel/futex.c | 12 ++--
> kernel/locking/r
3 matches
Mail list logo
