On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:09:14 +0200
"Luis R. Rodriguez" wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 09:02:04PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Saturday 03 October 2015 01:53:46 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, my gut feeling tells me that your approach won't solve the problem
> > > > in gener
On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 09:02:04PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 03 October 2015 01:53:46 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmm, my gut feeling tells me that your approach won't solve the problem
> > > in general. s390 PCI is just weird in many ways and it will occasionally
> > > su
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 05:14:20PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 10/02/15 16:17, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 07:13:08PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 08/28/15 17:17, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >>>
> >>> arch/s390/Kconfig | 8 +
> >>> arch/s390/i
On Saturday 03 October 2015 01:53:46 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, my gut feeling tells me that your approach won't solve the problem
> > in general. s390 PCI is just weird in many ways and it will occasionally
> > suffer from problems like this (as do other aspects of the s390 architectur
On 10/02/15 16:17, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 07:13:08PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 08/28/15 17:17, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>
>>> arch/s390/Kconfig | 8 +
>>> arch/s390/include/asm/io.h| 11 ---
>>> arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 10:14:09AM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 15:42:40 +0200
> Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 03 September 2015 03:44:15 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 09:30:26PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Friday 28 August 20
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:42:40PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 03 September 2015 03:44:15 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 09:30:26PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 28 August 2015 17:17:27 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > While at it, as with the iorem
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 07:13:08PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/28/15 17:17, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >
> > arch/s390/Kconfig | 8 +
> > arch/s390/include/asm/io.h| 11 ---
> > arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h | 2 --
> > arch/s390/include/asm/pci_iomap.
On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 15:42:40 +0200
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 03 September 2015 03:44:15 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 09:30:26PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 28 August 2015 17:17:27 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > While at it, as with the ioremap*()
On Thursday 03 September 2015 03:44:15 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 09:30:26PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 28 August 2015 17:17:27 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > While at it, as with the ioremap*() variants, since we have no clear
> > > semantics yet well defined
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:47 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> I don't think we really need to spell it out here. s390 PCI is different
>>> from everybody else's in a lot of ways, so a simple 'depends on PCI &&
>>> !S390' for CONFIG_PCI_IOM
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> I don't think we really need to spell it out here. s390 PCI is different
>> from everybody else's in a lot of ways, so a simple 'depends on PCI &&
>> !S390' for CONFIG_PCI_IOMAP seems simpler and more intuitive.
>
> Sure that would work a
On Sat, Aug 29, 2015 at 08:25:05AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:17:27PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
> >
> > The S390 architecture requires a custom pci_iomap() implementation
> > as the asm-generic implementation assumes there are
On Sun, Aug 30, 2015 at 09:30:26PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 28 August 2015 17:17:27 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
> >
> > The S390 architecture requires a custom pci_iomap() implementation
> > as the asm-generic implementation assumes there are disjunctions
On Friday 28 August 2015 17:17:27 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>
> The S390 architecture requires a custom pci_iomap() implementation
> as the asm-generic implementation assumes there are disjunctions
> between PCI BARs, and on S390 PCI BAR are not disjunctive, S390 requir
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:17:27PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> From: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
>
> The S390 architecture requires a custom pci_iomap() implementation
> as the asm-generic implementation assumes there are disjunctions
> between PCI BARs, and on S390 PCI BAR are not disjunctive, S39
On 08/28/15 17:17, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
> arch/s390/Kconfig | 8 +
> arch/s390/include/asm/io.h| 11 ---
> arch/s390/include/asm/pci.h | 2 --
> arch/s390/include/asm/pci_iomap.h | 33 +
> arch/s390/pci/pci.c | 2 ++
17 matches
Mail list logo
