On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:05:29 -0500, Rob Herring
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Grant Likely
>>> wrote:
>>> > The "platform_bus" (note: not platform_bus_type) only exis
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:05:29 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Grant Likely
>> wrote:
>> > The "platform_bus" (note: not platform_bus_type) only exists as an empty
>> > directory to put platform devices into. How
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:05:29 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Grant Likely
>> wrote:
>> > The "platform_bus" (note: not platform_bus_type) only exists as an empty
>> > directory to put platform devices into. How
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 16:05:29 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Grant Likely
> wrote:
> > The "platform_bus" (note: not platform_bus_type) only exists as an empty
> > directory to put platform devices into. However, it really doesn't make
> > sense to segregate all the
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> The "platform_bus" (note: not platform_bus_type) only exists as an empty
> directory to put platform devices into. However, it really doesn't make
> sense to segregate all the platform devices into a sub directory when
> typically they are mem
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Grant Likely
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> wrote:
>>> If the devices don't show up under platform/ where are they going to be
>>> at now, virtual/ ? That doesn't sound li
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 02:44:31PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>>> The "platform_bus" (note: not platform_bus_type) only exists as an empty
>>> directory to put platform devices in
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 3:52 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 02:44:31PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>> The "platform_bus" (note: not platform_bus_type) only exists as an empty
>> directory to put platform devices into. However, it really doesn't make
>> sense to segregate al
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 02:44:31PM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> The "platform_bus" (note: not platform_bus_type) only exists as an empty
> directory to put platform devices into. However, it really doesn't make
> sense to segregate all the platform devices into a sub directory when
> typically they
9 matches
Mail list logo