Re: [RFC] zram: support page-based parallel write

2016-09-07 Thread Minchan Kim
Hi Sergey, On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 10:34:44AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Hello Minchan, > > sorry, I don't have enough time at the moment to review it in details > due to some urgent issues I'm working on. can this wait? Why not. I need a time to complete the work for removing RFC tag,

Re: [RFC] zram: support page-based parallel write

2016-09-07 Thread Minchan Kim
Hello, On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:22:20AM +0200, Andreas Mohr wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:24:17PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > @@ -1464,6 +1908,9 @@ static int __init zram_init(void) > > num_devices--; > > } > > > > + if (create_workers()) > > + goto out_erro

Re: [RFC] zram: support page-based parallel write

2016-09-07 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
Hello Minchan, sorry, I don't have enough time at the moment to review it in details due to some urgent issues I'm working on. can this wait? I was looking at loop.c awhile ago and was considering to do something similar to what they have done; but it never happened. I'm a bit 'surprised' tha

Re: [RFC] zram: support page-based parallel write

2016-09-06 Thread Andreas Mohr
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 04:24:17PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > @@ -1464,6 +1908,9 @@ static int __init zram_init(void) > num_devices--; > } > > + if (create_workers()) > + goto out_error; > + > return 0; > > out_error: > @@ -1474,6 +1921,7 @@ static in