Hello Arnd,
On 6/25/20 3:48 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 8:51 PM André Almeida
> wrote:
>
>> - The proposed interface uses ktime_t type for absolute timeout, and I
>> assumed that it should use values in a nsec resolution. If this is true,
>> we have some problems with
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 8:51 PM André Almeida wrote:
> - The proposed interface uses ktime_t type for absolute timeout, and I
> assumed that it should use values in a nsec resolution. If this is true,
> we have some problems with i386 ABI, please check out the
> COMPAT_32BIT_TIME implementa
Hello H.J.,
On 6/12/20 4:35 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:53 AM André Almeida via Libc-alpha
> wrote:
>> - Is expected to have a x32 ABI implementation as well? In the case of
>> wait and wake, we could use the same as x86_64 ABI. However, for the
>> waitv (aka wait on multi
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:53 AM André Almeida via Libc-alpha
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This RFC is a followup to the previous discussion initiated from my last
> patch "futex: Implement mechanism to wait on any of several futexes"[1].
> As stated in the thread, the correct approach to move forward wi
4 matches
Mail list logo
