Re: [RFC 00/12] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature

2016-06-26 Thread Byungchul Park
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:26:45PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 06/24/2016 02:37 AM, Byungchul Park wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:55:15PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I have a plan to resend this patchset after reinforcement of > > documentation. However

Re: [RFC 00/12] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature

2016-06-24 Thread Nikolay Borisov
On 06/24/2016 02:37 AM, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:55:15PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a plan to resend this patchset after reinforcement of > documentation. However I am wondering what you think about the > main concept of this. A main motivation

Re: [RFC 00/12] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature

2016-06-24 Thread Byungchul Park
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 09:08:44AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:37:13AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:55:15PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I have a plan to resend this patchset after reinforcement of > > documentati

Re: [RFC 00/12] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature

2016-06-24 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 08:37:13AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:55:15PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a plan to resend this patchset after reinforcement of > documentation. However I am wondering what you think about the > main concept of this.

Re: [RFC 00/12] lockdep: Implement crossrelease feature

2016-06-23 Thread Byungchul Park
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:55:15PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: Hello, I have a plan to resend this patchset after reinforcement of documentation. However I am wondering what you think about the main concept of this. A main motivation is to be able to detect several problems which I describes wit