> On 08/24/2014 07:14 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:52:22AM -0400, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> >>> On 08/20/2014 07:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:58:17PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:37:18PM CEST, pagu...@re
On 08/24/2014 07:14 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:52:22AM -0400, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>>> On 08/20/2014 07:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:58:17PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:37:18PM CEST, pagu...@redhat.com wr
On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 07:52:22AM -0400, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
>
> >
> > On 08/20/2014 07:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:58:17PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> > >> > Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:37:18PM CEST, pagu...@redhat.com wrote:
> > >>> > > This patch publishes max
>
> On 08/20/2014 07:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:58:17PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> > Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:37:18PM CEST, pagu...@redhat.com wrote:
> >>> > > This patch publishes maximum number of tun/tap queues allocated as a
> >>> > > read_only module pa
On 08/20/2014 07:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:58:17PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> > Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:37:18PM CEST, pagu...@redhat.com wrote:
>>> > > This patch publishes maximum number of tun/tap queues allocated as a
>>> > > read_only module parameter which
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:46:20PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:17:24PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
> >On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:58:17PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >> Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:37:18PM CEST, pagu...@redhat.com wrote:
> >> > This patch publishes maximum number o
Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:17:24PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:58:17PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:37:18PM CEST, pagu...@redhat.com wrote:
>> > This patch publishes maximum number of tun/tap queues allocated as a
>> > read_only module parameter whic
Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:49:07PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:46:20PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 01:17:24PM CEST, m...@redhat.com wrote:
>> >On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:58:17PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:37:18PM CEST, pagu.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:58:17PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:37:18PM CEST, pagu...@redhat.com wrote:
> > This patch publishes maximum number of tun/tap queues allocated as a
> > read_only module parameter which a user space application like libvirt
> > can make use of to li
Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:37:18PM CEST, pagu...@redhat.com wrote:
> This patch publishes maximum number of tun/tap queues allocated as a
> read_only module parameter which a user space application like libvirt
> can make use of to limit maximum number of queues. Value of read_only
> module parameter
10 matches
Mail list logo