Re: [RFC PATCH] cpufreq: mark duplicate frequencies as invalid and continue as normal

2019-10-23 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 23-10-19, 10:06, Sudeep Holla wrote: > I agree, we shouldn't. But this is in IKS which is built in the merged > table by the driver. We can fix that, but found this easier and simple. > And since it was allowed when the driver was merged, just thought of > checking the details with you. That wa

Re: [RFC PATCH] cpufreq: mark duplicate frequencies as invalid and continue as normal

2019-10-23 Thread Sudeep Holla
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:56:08AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 22-10-19, 18:32, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Currently if we encounter duplicate frequency table entries, we abort > > the validation and return error immediately. Instead of failing, we > > can mark the entry as invalid and continue to

Re: [RFC PATCH] cpufreq: mark duplicate frequencies as invalid and continue as normal

2019-10-22 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 22-10-19, 18:32, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Currently if we encounter duplicate frequency table entries, we abort > the validation and return error immediately. Instead of failing, we > can mark the entry as invalid and continue to function normal. > > Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" > Cc: Viresh Kumar >