Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-02-18 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 09:28:45AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 09:38 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:05:25PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 10:25 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:01:13AM +0800, Ian K

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-01-21 Thread Ian Kent
On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 09:38 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:05:25PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 10:25 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:01:13AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 11:27 -0500, J. Bruce Fie

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-01-21 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 03:05:25PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 10:25 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:01:13AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 11:27 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:26:12AM +0800, Ian K

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-01-20 Thread Ian Kent
On Fri, 2015-01-16 at 10:25 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:01:13AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 11:27 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:26:12AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 17:10 -0500, J. Bruce Fie

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-01-16 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 09:01:13AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 11:27 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:26:12AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 17:10 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:32:22PM +0800, Ian

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-01-15 Thread Ian Kent
On Thu, 2015-01-15 at 11:27 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:26:12AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 17:10 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:32:22PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > > There are other difficulties to tackle as w

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-01-15 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:26:12AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 17:10 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:32:22PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > > There are other difficulties to tackle as well, such as how to decide > > > > if contained helper execution i

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-01-14 Thread Ian Kent
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 17:10 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:32:22PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > > There are other difficulties to tackle as well, such as how to decide > > > if contained helper execution is needed. For example, if a mount has > > > been propagated to a c

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-01-14 Thread J. Bruce Fields
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:32:22PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > > There are other difficulties to tackle as well, such as how to decide > > if contained helper execution is needed. For example, if a mount has > > been propagated to a container or bound into the container tree (such > > as with the --

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-01-14 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 05:32:22PM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > This series is a further attempt to find how (or even an acceptable > way) to execute a usermode helper in a contained environment. > > Being an attempt to find how to do this no testing has been done and > won't be until a suitable appro