Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] perf: Add AUX data sampling

2016-09-23 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:35:27PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:19:43AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 01:49:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 02:27:20PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > > > > Hi Peter, > > > > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] perf: Add AUX data sampling

2016-09-23 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:19:43AM -0700, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 01:49:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 02:27:20PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > > > Hi Peter, > > > > > > This is an RFC, I'm not sending the tooling bits in this series, > > > a

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] perf: Add AUX data sampling

2016-09-23 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 01:49:17PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 02:27:20PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > > Hi Peter, > > > > This is an RFC, I'm not sending the tooling bits in this series, > > although they can be found here [1]. > > > > This series introduces AUX

Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] perf: Add AUX data sampling

2016-09-23 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 02:27:20PM +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Hi Peter, > > This is an RFC, I'm not sending the tooling bits in this series, > although they can be found here [1]. > > This series introduces AUX data sampling for perf events, which in > case of our instruction/branch traci