Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-06 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Hi Mark, Stephen and Pawel, On 03-09-2013 09:15, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:19:43AM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > I think that the above can describe that, but I'd like to see a binding > document so we can consider it in more detail. Find below another proposal. It is

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-03 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Hi Mark, On 03-09-2013 09:15, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:19:43AM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >> Mark, Pawel and Stephen, >> >> >> On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >>> On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduard

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-03 Thread Mark Rutland
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 12:19:43AM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Mark, Pawel and Stephen, > > > On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > > On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > >>> Hello Mark, Hi, sorry for the

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-02 Thread Eduardo Valentin
On 29-08-2013 19:19, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Mark, Pawel and Stephen, > > > On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >> On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Hello Mark, > > > > I believe now we need to align o

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-09-02 Thread Wei Ni
On 08/30/2013 07:19 AM, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > * PGP Signed: 08/29/2013 at 04:19:46 PM > > Mark, Pawel and Stephen, > > > On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >> On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: Hello M

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-29 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Mark, Pawel and Stephen, On 27-08-2013 14:17, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >>> Hello Mark, I believe now we need to align on thermal bindings, before I propose next version of this series

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-27 Thread Eduardo Valentin
On 27-08-2013 12:23, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: >> Hello Mark, >> >> >> First of all, thanks for taking the time to review in such level of >> detail. Lets try to align and have a common understanding. Answers go >> inline. Please let me

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-27 Thread Mark Rutland
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:44:40PM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > Hello Mark, > > > First of all, thanks for taking the time to review in such level of > detail. Lets try to align and have a common understanding. Answers go > inline. Please let me know if I missed something or if I made it more >

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-27 Thread Eduardo Valentin
Hello Mark, First of all, thanks for taking the time to review in such level of detail. Lets try to align and have a common understanding. Answers go inline. Please let me know if I missed something or if I made it more confusing :-) On 27-08-2013 06:22, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Au

Re: [RFC PATCH 02/14] drivers: thermal: introduce device tree parser

2013-08-27 Thread Mark Rutland
Hi, On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 12:15:43AM +0100, Eduardo Valentin wrote: > In order to be able to build thermal policies > based on generic sensors, like I2C device, that > can be places in different points on different boards, > there is a need to have a way to feed board dependent > data into the t