On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 08:37:27PM +, Atish Patra wrote:
> That would split the implementation between C file & assembly file for
> no good reason.
>
> How about moving everything in sbi.c and just write everything inline
> assembly there.
Well, if we implement it in pure assembly that would
On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:37:00 PDT (-0700), r...@linux.ibm.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 01:58:03PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:21 PM Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:32:55PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> > As per the new SBI specification, current SBI
On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 07:03 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SET_TIMER 0x0
> > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR 0x1
> > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CONSOLE_GETCHAR 0x2
> > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CLEAR_IPI 0x3
> > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SEND_IPI 0x4
> > +#define SBI_E
On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 10:51 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:32:55PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> > As per the new SBI specification, current SBI implementation is
> > defined as legacy and will be removed/replaced in future.
> >
> > Rename existing implementation to reflect
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 07:03:04AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SET_TIMER 0x0
> > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR 0x1
> > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CONSOLE_GETCHAR 0x2
> > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CLEAR_IPI 0x3
> > +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SEND_IPI 0x4
> > +#defin
> +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SET_TIMER 0x0
> +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CONSOLE_PUTCHAR 0x1
> +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CONSOLE_GETCHAR 0x2
> +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_CLEAR_IPI 0x3
> +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_SEND_IPI 0x4
> +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_REMOTE_FENCE_I 0x5
> +#define SBI_EXT_LEGACY_REMOTE_SFENCE_VMA
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 01:58:03PM +0530, Anup Patel wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:21 PM Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:32:55PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> > > As per the new SBI specification, current SBI implementation is
> > > defined as legacy and will be removed/
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 1:21 PM Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:32:55PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> > As per the new SBI specification, current SBI implementation is
> > defined as legacy and will be removed/replaced in future.
> >
> > Rename existing implementation to reflect
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:32:55PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> As per the new SBI specification, current SBI implementation is
> defined as legacy and will be removed/replaced in future.
>
> Rename existing implementation to reflect that. This patch is just
> a preparatory patch for SBI v0.2 and d
9 matches
Mail list logo
