On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:09:05PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Joonsoo Kim writes:
>
> > Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA
> > subsystem and the other is the kvm on powerpc. They have their own code
> > to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really s
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 08:56:00AM +0200, Michal Nazarewicz wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA
> > subsystem and the other is the kvm on powerpc. They have their own code
> > to manage CMA reserved area even if th
Joonsoo Kim writes:
> Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA
> subsystem and the other is the kvm on powerpc. They have their own code
> to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really similar.
> From my guess, it is caused by some needs on bitmap management. Kv
On Tue, Jun 03 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA
> subsystem and the other is the kvm on powerpc. They have their own code
> to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really similar.
> From my guess, it is caused by some needs on bit
4 matches
Mail list logo
