Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] tracing/hwlat: Add a cpus file specific for hwlat_detector

2021-04-15 Thread Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
On 4/15/21 3:49 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > OK, for osnoise, I can see how it is useful. But as you said above, for > hwlat tracer, it's not as useful. I agree, it is not as useful. -- Daniel

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] tracing/hwlat: Add a cpus file specific for hwlat_detector

2021-04-15 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 15:09:50 +0200 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: > But for the osnoise tracer the cpus file is really useful. For instance, on a > system with the CPU 7 isolated: > > - %< - > # echo 7 > osnoise/cpus > # echo target_cpu == 7 > events/sched/sched_wakeup/filter > #

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] tracing/hwlat: Add a cpus file specific for hwlat_detector

2021-04-15 Thread Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
On 4/14/21 4:10 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:13:19 +0200 > Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: > >> Provides a "cpus" interface to the hardware latency detector. By >> default, it lists all CPUs, allowing hwlatd threads to run on any online >> CPU of the system. >> >> It serve

Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] tracing/hwlat: Add a cpus file specific for hwlat_detector

2021-04-14 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:13:19 +0200 Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: > Provides a "cpus" interface to the hardware latency detector. By > default, it lists all CPUs, allowing hwlatd threads to run on any online > CPU of the system. > > It serves to restrict the execution of hwlatd to the set of