On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 06:01:31AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> >This means we could have multiple watchdogs in the system, where we
> >really want a specific one (maybe designated through a DT property) to
> >do the reset. This isn't compatible with the "last watchdog that
> >registers a handler
Am Mittwoch, den 07.05.2014, 06:01 -0700 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On 05/07/2014 04:52 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> >
> > Am Freitag, den 02.05.2014, 21:29 -0700 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> >> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:22:43PM -0700, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> >>> Hi Guenter,
> >>>
> >>> On Th
On 05/07/2014 04:52 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
Hi Guenter,
Am Freitag, den 02.05.2014, 21:29 -0700 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:22:43PM -0700, Maxime Ripard wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:41:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Some hardware implements reboot thro
Hi Guenter,
Am Freitag, den 02.05.2014, 21:29 -0700 schrieb Guenter Roeck:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:22:43PM -0700, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Hi Guenter,
> >
> > On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:41:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > Some hardware implements reboot through its watchdog hardware,
>
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 01:36:06PM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:41:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Some hardware implements reboot through its watchdog hardware,
> > for example by triggering a watchdog timeout. Platform specific
> > code starts to spread into watchd
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:41:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Some hardware implements reboot through its watchdog hardware,
> for example by triggering a watchdog timeout. Platform specific
> code starts to spread into watchdog drivers, typically by setting
> pointers to a callback functions wh
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 09:29:25PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > + if (wdd->ops->reboot)
> > > + wdd_reboot_dev = wdd;
> > > +
> >
> > Overall, it looks really great, but I guess we can make it a
> > list. Otherwise, we might end up in a situation where we could not
> > reboot anymore,
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:22:43PM -0700, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:41:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Some hardware implements reboot through its watchdog hardware,
> > for example by triggering a watchdog timeout. Platform specific
> > code starts to
Hi Guenter,
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:41:29AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Some hardware implements reboot through its watchdog hardware,
> for example by triggering a watchdog timeout. Platform specific
> code starts to spread into watchdog drivers, typically by setting
> pointers to a callback
On 05/02/2014 03:01 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Guenter,
This looks pretty sensible to me (and the arm/arm64 bits look fine too), but
I have one question below...
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:41:29PM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
Some hardware implements reboot through its watchdog hardware,
for exa
Hi Guenter,
This looks pretty sensible to me (and the arm/arm64 bits look fine too), but
I have one question below...
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 04:41:29PM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> Some hardware implements reboot through its watchdog hardware,
> for example by triggering a watchdog timeout. Pla
11 matches
Mail list logo
