On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 04:31:09PM +0930, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
>
> Indeed. Hence RFC in case I had overlooked something :) Clearly I have.
>
Not surprising. It isn't exceptionally well documented :-)
> >
> > > However, the addition of the callbacks was driven by the behaviour of
> > > the MAX3
On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 20:43 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 07/11/2017 05:39 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 06:40 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 07/10/2017 06:56 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > > > Augment PMBus support to include control of fans via the
> > > > FAN_COMMAN
On 07/11/2017 05:39 PM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 06:40 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 07/10/2017 06:56 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
Augment PMBus support to include control of fans via the
FAN_COMMAND_[1-4] registers, both in RPM and PWM modes. The behaviour
of FAN_CONFIG_{1_2,3
On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 06:40 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 07/10/2017 06:56 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
> > Augment PMBus support to include control of fans via the
> > FAN_COMMAND_[1-4] registers, both in RPM and PWM modes. The behaviour
> > of FAN_CONFIG_{1_2,3_4} and FAN_COMMAND_[1-4] are tightl
On 07/10/2017 06:56 AM, Andrew Jeffery wrote:
Augment PMBus support to include control of fans via the
FAN_COMMAND_[1-4] registers, both in RPM and PWM modes. The behaviour
of FAN_CONFIG_{1_2,3_4} and FAN_COMMAND_[1-4] are tightly coupled, and
their interactions do not fit the existing use of str
5 matches
Mail list logo
