On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 03:46:05PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> On 27.08.2013 15:34, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> >> On 24.08.2013 21:44, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:21:12PM +0200, Peter Oberpa
On 27.08.2013 15:34, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
>> On 24.08.2013 21:44, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:21:12PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
On 23.08.2013 17:15, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> On
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:14:07PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> On 24.08.2013 21:44, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:21:12PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> >> On 23.08.2013 17:15, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> >>> On 23.08.2013 10:39, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
>
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 02:56:04PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> On 24.08.2013 21:12, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:15:19PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> >> Also it is my understanding that there are some distribution-specific
> >> versions
> >> of GCC that inc
On 24.08.2013 21:44, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:21:12PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
>> On 23.08.2013 17:15, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
>>> On 23.08.2013 10:39, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
Compile the correct gcov implementation file for a specific gcc version. In
>>
On 24.08.2013 21:12, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:15:19PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
>> Also it is my understanding that there are some distribution-specific
>> versions
>> of GCC that include the 4.7. gcov format code but report GCC version 4.6.
>> With
>> the auto
On Saturday 24 August 2013, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> If I understand it correctly, this would mean that you will be able to use
> only
> one implementation of gcov format at the time. Meaning you will be able to get
> coverage data for module, but not for kernel if it was compiled with different
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:21:12PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> On 23.08.2013 17:15, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> > On 23.08.2013 10:39, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> >> Compile the correct gcov implementation file for a specific gcc version. In
> >> the future, if another file is added, the con
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 05:15:19PM +0200, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> On 23.08.2013 10:39, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> > Compile the correct gcov implementation file for a specific gcc version. In
> > the future, if another file is added, the conditions will need to be somehow
> > adjusted to if-eli
On 23.08.2013 17:15, Peter Oberparleiter wrote:
> On 23.08.2013 10:39, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
>> Compile the correct gcov implementation file for a specific gcc version. In
>> the future, if another file is added, the conditions will need to be somehow
>> adjusted to if-elif-else case, but at this
On 23.08.2013 10:39, Frantisek Hrbata wrote:
> Compile the correct gcov implementation file for a specific gcc version. In
> the future, if another file is added, the conditions will need to be somehow
> adjusted to if-elif-else case, but at this point the simple cc-ifversion
> should
> be enough.
11 matches
Mail list logo