Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] ACPI based system device hotplug framework

2012-08-09 Thread Jiang Liu
On 08/09/2012 12:27 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Jiang Liu wrote: >> On 08/08/2012 07:38 AM, Toshi Kani wrote: > >>> It is nice to see redundant ACPI namespace walks removed from the ACPI >>> drivers. But why do you need to add a new enumerator to create the >>> acp

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] ACPI based system device hotplug framework

2012-08-08 Thread Toshi Kani
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 23:44 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: > On 08/08/2012 07:38 AM, Toshi Kani wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 20:13 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: > >> From: Jiang Liu > >> > >> The patchset is based on v3.5-rc6 and you may pull them from: > >> git://github.com/jiangliu/linux.git acpihp > >>

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] ACPI based system device hotplug framework

2012-08-08 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Jiang Liu wrote: > On 08/08/2012 07:38 AM, Toshi Kani wrote: >> It is nice to see redundant ACPI namespace walks removed from the ACPI >> drivers. But why do you need to add a new enumerator to create the >> acpihp_slot tree, in addition to the current acpi_device

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] ACPI based system device hotplug framework

2012-08-08 Thread Jiang Liu
On 08/08/2012 07:38 AM, Toshi Kani wrote: > On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 20:13 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: >> From: Jiang Liu >> >> The patchset is based on v3.5-rc6 and you may pull them from: >> git://github.com/jiangliu/linux.git acpihp >> >> Modern high-end server may support advanced hotplug features fo

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] ACPI based system device hotplug framework

2012-08-07 Thread Toshi Kani
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 20:13 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote: > From: Jiang Liu > > The patchset is based on v3.5-rc6 and you may pull them from: > git://github.com/jiangliu/linux.git acpihp > > Modern high-end server may support advanced hotplug features for system > devices, including physical processor