Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/12] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-03-19 Thread Ian Kent
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 16:38 -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Ian Kent writes: > > > Here is another update to the attempt at contained helper execution. > > > > The main change is I've tried to incorporate Oleg's suggestions > > of directly constructing the namespaces rather than using the > > o

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/12] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-03-19 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Ian Kent writes: > Here is another update to the attempt at contained helper execution. > > The main change is I've tried to incorporate Oleg's suggestions > of directly constructing the namespaces rather than using the > open/setns approach and the addition of a namespace hash store. > > I'm not

Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/12] Second attempt at contained helper execution

2015-03-18 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 10:44:49AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote: > The other change has been to the nfs and KEYS patches. > I've introduced the ability to get a token that can be used to > save namespace information for later execution and I've attempted > to use that for persistent namespace execution, a