> It seems sensible the more CPU we get in the cluster, the more
> we need the kernel to be aware of its existence.
>
> Tim, it is possible for you to bring up the cpu_cluster_mask and
> cluster_sibling for x86 so that the topology can be represented
> in sysfs and be used by scheduler? It seems
@openeuler.org; h...@zytor.com
> Subject: [Linuxarm] Re: [RFC PATCH v4 3/3] scheduler: Add cluster scheduler
> level for x86
>
>
>
> On 3/2/21 2:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 11:59:40AM +1300, Barry Song wrote:
> >> From: Tim Chen
> &
On 3/2/21 2:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 11:59:40AM +1300, Barry Song wrote:
>> From: Tim Chen
>>
>> There are x86 CPU architectures (e.g. Jacobsville) where L2 cahce
>> is shared among a cluster of cores instead of being exclusive
>> to one single core.
>
> Isn't tha
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 11:59:40AM +1300, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Tim Chen
>
> There are x86 CPU architectures (e.g. Jacobsville) where L2 cahce
> is shared among a cluster of cores instead of being exclusive
> to one single core.
Isn't that most atoms one way or another? Tremont seems to have
4 matches
Mail list logo
