On 04-Nov 15:16, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 27-10-16, 18:41, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> > +This last requirement is especially important if we consider that
> > schedutil can
> > +potentially replace all currently available CPUFreq policies. Since
> > schedutil
> > +is event based, as opposed to the
On 27-10-16, 18:41, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> +This last requirement is especially important if we consider that schedutil
> can
> +potentially replace all currently available CPUFreq policies. Since schedutil
> +is event based, as opposed to the sampling driven governors, it is already
> more
> +
2 matches
Mail list logo
