On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 3:48 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28 April 2016 at 23:28, Rob Clark wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:48:02PM -0700, Greg Hackmann wrote:
A (per-CRTC?) array of fences would be more flexible. And e
On 04/26/2016 11:39 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
A (per-CRTC?) array of fences would be more flexible. And even in the cases
where you could make a 1-to-1 mapping between planes and fences, it's not
that much more work for userspace to assemble those fences into an array
anyway.
I'm ok with an arr
Hi,
On 28 April 2016 at 23:28, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:48:02PM -0700, Greg Hackmann wrote:
>>> A (per-CRTC?) array of fences would be more flexible. And even in the cases
>>> where you could make a 1-to-1 mapping bet
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 2:39 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:48:02PM -0700, Greg Hackmann wrote:
>> On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>> >>On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:23:46PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wro
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
>> > - implicit fences also needs one fence per plane/fb, so it will be good to
>> >match with that.
>>
>> We would actually need a fence per object rather than per fb.
>
> I guess you could overcome this by automagically creating a merged
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:56:19PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:36:44AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > 2016-04-27 Daniel Stone :
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 26 April 2016 at 21:48, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> > > > On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > >>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Gustavo Padovan
wrote:
> 2016-04-28 Ville Syrjälä :
>
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:43:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ville Syrjälä
>> > wrote:
>> > >> - better for tracing, can identify the buffer/fence promptly
>> > >
>>
2016-04-28 Ville Syrjälä :
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:43:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ville Syrjälä
> > wrote:
> > >> - better for tracing, can identify the buffer/fence promptly
> > >
> > > Can fences be reused somehow while still attached to a plane,
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:43:16PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ville Syrjälä
> wrote:
> >> - better for tracing, can identify the buffer/fence promptly
> >
> > Can fences be reused somehow while still attached to a plane, or ever?
> > That might cause some oddne
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
>> - better for tracing, can identify the buffer/fence promptly
>
> Can fences be reused somehow while still attached to a plane, or ever?
> That might cause some oddness if you, say, leave a fence attached to one
> plane and then do a modeset
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:36:44AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2016-04-27 Daniel Stone :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 26 April 2016 at 21:48, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> > > On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > >>> What are
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:36:44AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2016-04-27 Daniel Stone :
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 26 April 2016 at 21:48, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> > > On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > >>> What are
2016-04-27 Daniel Stone :
> Hi,
>
> On 26 April 2016 at 21:48, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> > On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>> What are they doing that can't stuff the fences into an array
> >>> instead of props?
> >
Hi,
On 26 April 2016 at 21:48, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>>> What are they doing that can't stuff the fences into an array
>>> instead of props?
>>
>> The hw composer interface is one in-fe
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:48:02PM -0700, Greg Hackmann wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >>On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:23:46PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:40:45PM +0300, Ville Syr
On 04/26/2016 01:05 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:23:46PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:40:45PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
But really the reason for per-plane is hw composer from
Andro
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 09:55:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:23:46PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:40:45PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:20:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:23:46PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:40:45PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:20:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:26:21PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:40:45PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:20:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:26:21PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:36:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:20:49PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:26:21PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:36:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:14:22AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > > > 2016-04-26 Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 07:26:21PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:36:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:14:22AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > > 2016-04-26 Ville Syrjälä :
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:33:25PM -0300, Gustavo Pado
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:36:36PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:14:22AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > 2016-04-26 Ville Syrjälä :
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:33:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > > > From: Gustavo Padovan
> > > >
> > > > There is now a
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:14:22AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2016-04-26 Ville Syrjälä :
>
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:33:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > > From: Gustavo Padovan
> > >
> > > There is now a new property called FENCE_FD attached to every plane
> > > state that receiv
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:14:22AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2016-04-26 Ville Syrjälä :
>
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:33:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > > From: Gustavo Padovan
> > >
> > > There is now a new property called FENCE_FD attached to every plane
> > > state that receiv
2016-04-26 Ville Syrjälä :
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:33:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> > From: Gustavo Padovan
> >
> > There is now a new property called FENCE_FD attached to every plane
> > state that receives the sync_file fd from userspace via the atomic commit
> > IOCTL.
>
> I stil
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 07:33:25PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan
>
> There is now a new property called FENCE_FD attached to every plane
> state that receives the sync_file fd from userspace via the atomic commit
> IOCTL.
I still don't like this property abuse. Also with
26 matches
Mail list logo
