On Wed, 9 Jul 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 07:30:40AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > All devices do this - it's done as part of the driver model core code so
> > > there is no need for individual buses to do anything.
>
> > How s
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 07:30:40AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
> > All devices do this - it's done as part of the driver model core code so
> > there is no need for individual buses to do anything.
> How should one realize that this does not apply to the ori
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:15:20AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
>
> > > It should be fairly clear given what they do I'd have thought - the
> > > devm_ functions tie the deallocation of a resource to the unbinding o
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 10:15:20AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It should be fairly clear given what they do I'd have thought - the
> > devm_ functions tie the deallocation of a resource to the unbinding of
> > a driver from a device so they can only be us
On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 05:23:39PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> > There is documentation about what kinds of devm functions exist, but it is
> > too bad that there is no documentation about where they can be used.
> > Often there are several levels of fu
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 05:23:39PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> There is documentation about what kinds of devm functions exist, but it is
> too bad that there is no documentation about where they can be used.
> Often there are several levels of function pointers involved, so it can be
> hard to f
On 07/07/2014 05:23 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
Nevertheless, there is already a call to devm_regulator_bulk_get in
sgtl5000_enable_regulators which calls sgtl5000_replace_vddd_with_ldo
which calls ld
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
> > Nevertheless, there is already a call to devm_regulator_bulk_get in
> > sgtl5000_enable_regulators which calls sgtl5000_replace_vddd_with_ldo
> > which calls ldo_regulator_register. That call
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Nevertheless, there is already a call to devm_regulator_bulk_get in
> sgtl5000_enable_regulators which calls sgtl5000_replace_vddd_with_ldo
> which calls ldo_regulator_register. That call was introduced by
>
> commit 63e54cd9caa3ce0363581060
9 matches
Mail list logo
