Re: [bpf] 568f196756: BUG:assuming_atomic_context_at_kernel/seccomp.c

2019-02-22 Thread valdis . kletnieks
On Sat, 23 Feb 2019 00:15:38 +0100, Jann Horn said: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:42 PM wrote: > > Is there a reason this commit appeared in next-20190221 but did not seem to > > be > > in next-20190222 (confirmed via 'git tag --contains')?y ast@, he wanted to > > fix it in a different way: > htt

Re: [bpf] 568f196756: BUG:assuming_atomic_context_at_kernel/seccomp.c

2019-02-22 Thread Jann Horn
On Fri, Feb 22, 2019 at 11:42 PM wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:39:27 +0100, Daniel Borkmann said: > > Fyi, false positive and already fixed in bpf-next. > > > > (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=435b3ff5b08a99a15647be32735abf8db66cea9a) > > Is there a

Re: [bpf] 568f196756: BUG:assuming_atomic_context_at_kernel/seccomp.c

2019-02-22 Thread valdis . kletnieks
On Thu, 21 Feb 2019 14:39:27 +0100, Daniel Borkmann said: > Fyi, false positive and already fixed in bpf-next. > > (https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/commit/?id=435b3ff5b08a99a15647be32735abf8db66cea9a) Is there a reason this commit appeared in next-20190221 but did

Re: [bpf] 568f196756: BUG:assuming_atomic_context_at_kernel/seccomp.c

2019-02-21 Thread Daniel Borkmann
On 02/21/2019 02:35 PM, kernel test robot wrote: > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7): > > commit: 568f196756ad9fe2b49c46bbf6a9de1b190438b4 ("bpf: check that BPF > programs run with preemption disabled") > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git ma