RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] f2fs: avoid unnecessary f2fs_gc for dir operations

> -Original Message- > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org] > Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 10:13 AM > To: Chao Yu > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; > linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATC

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] f2fs: avoid unnecessary f2fs_gc for dir operations

Hi Chao, Right. But, in the rename path, we still need to do f2fs_balance_fs, since it produces another dirty node page in the mean time. How about this? >From bbc5bf8f6c940cd75a4d71ce40ce4bd3f647a823 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaegeuk Kim Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:56:08 -0800 Subject: [PAT

RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] f2fs: avoid unnecessary f2fs_gc for dir operations

Hi Jaegeuk, > -Original Message- > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaeg...@kernel.org] > Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 2:55 AM > To: Chao Yu > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org; > linux-f2fs-de...@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [f2

Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/4 v2] f2fs: avoid unnecessary f2fs_gc for dir operations

Chang log from v1: - add more cases >From 9fea6346f5dd2992525e853e27a4fe899d122379 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jaegeuk Kim Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:56:08 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid unnecessary f2fs_gc for dir operations The f2fs_balance_fs doesn't need to cover f2fs_new_inode or f2f