On 8/13/2012 10:01 AM, Al Viro wrote:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:58:12AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
[...]
HOWEVER, it still doesn't address more fundamental problem - somebody
creating a socket and passing it to you in SCM_RIGHTS datagram will
leave you with a socket you can do IO on, still
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 09:58:12AM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> [...]
>
> >HOWEVER, it still doesn't address more fundamental problem - somebody
> >creating a socket and passing it to you in SCM_RIGHTS datagram will
> >leave you with a socket you can do IO on, still tagged according to who
> >ha
[...]
HOWEVER, it still doesn't address more fundamental problem - somebody
creating a socket and passing it to you in SCM_RIGHTS datagram will
leave you with a socket you can do IO on, still tagged according to who
had created it.
AFAICS, the whole point of that exercise was to allow third-par
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:23:59PM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> >OK clearly I screwed it up thanks for reviewing Al. How about this.
> >
> > fdt = files_fdtable(files);
> > for (fd = 0; fd < fdt->max_fds; fd++) {
> > struct socket *sock;
> >
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:55:17PM -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 8/12/2012 6:53 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> > Ladies and gentlemen, who the devil had reviewed that little gem?
> >
> >commit 406a3c638ce8b17d9704052c07955490f732c2b8
> >Author: John Fastabend
> >Date: Fri Jul 20 10:39:25 2012 +000
On Sun, 2012-08-12 at 22:55 -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
> On 8/12/2012 6:53 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> > Ladies and gentlemen, who the devil had reviewed that little gem?
> >
> > commit 406a3c638ce8b17d9704052c07955490f732c2b8
> > Author: John Fastabend
> > Date: Fri Jul 20 10:39:25 2012 +
[]
OK clearly I screwed it up thanks for reviewing Al. How about this.
fdt = files_fdtable(files);
for (fd = 0; fd < fdt->max_fds; fd++) {
struct socket *sock;
int err = 0;
sock = sockfd_loo
On 8/12/2012 6:53 PM, Al Viro wrote:
Ladies and gentlemen, who the devil had reviewed that little gem?
commit 406a3c638ce8b17d9704052c07955490f732c2b8
Author: John Fastabend
Date: Fri Jul 20 10:39:25 2012 +
is a bleeding bogosity that doesn't pass even the most cursory
inspection
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 02:53:48AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> if (old_priomap)
> memcpy(new_priomap->priomap, old_priomap,
^^^
old_priomap->priomap,
that is.
--
To unsubscribe from thi
9 matches
Mail list logo
