Re: [git pull] New firewire stack (updated)

2007-05-10 Thread Stefan Richter
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > ACK from me. I still have some comments but none of them is a merge > blocker. I put one small fix that Kristian sent on hold (const char * vs char * for shostt->proc_name) to let a related patch go to scsi-misc first. So this open item is my fault, not his. :-) -- Ste

Re: [git pull] New firewire stack (updated)

2007-05-10 Thread Stefan Richter
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:26:56PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: >> - The drivers still live in drivers/firewire/, i.e. have not been put >> into mainline's drivers/ieee1394/. > > I don't quite like that. Then again git handles renames pretty nicely > and I hope we

Re: [git pull] New firewire stack (updated)

2007-05-10 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 06:38:50PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:26:56PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > > Linus, please pull from the juju branch at > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ieee1394/linux1394-2.6.git > > juju > > > > ACK from

Re: [git pull] New firewire stack (updated)

2007-05-10 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 07:26:56PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > Linus, please pull from the juju branch at > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ieee1394/linux1394-2.6.git > juju > ACK from me. I still have some comments but none of them is a merge blocker. > What did _not_