On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 18:56 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Ok, in the meantime I had merged the parisc and powerpc trees, which
> had their own fixes in this area: powerpc added the transactional
> memory support for power8 (which impacted signal save/restore), and
> parisc had some fixes to the ro
On Sat, 2013-02-23 at 18:56 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> > * a bunch of signal-related syscalls (both native and compat) unified.
>
> Ok, in the meantime I had merged the parisc and powerpc trees, which
> had their own fixes in this area: powerp
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 06:56:02PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> > * a bunch of signal-related syscalls (both native and compat) unified.
>
> Ok, in the meantime I had merged the parisc and powerpc trees, which
> had their own fixes in this area:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> * a bunch of signal-related syscalls (both native and compat) unified.
Ok, in the meantime I had merged the parisc and powerpc trees, which
had their own fixes in this area: powerpc added the transactional
memory support for power8 (which impacted
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:52:14PM +, Al Viro wrote:
> That's the first pile; another one will come a bit later and will contain
> SYSCALL_DEFINE-related patches. Please, pull from
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/viro/signal for-linus
For the sake of completeness - one obvious
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:52:01AM +, James Hogan wrote:
> Reviewed-by: James Hogan
>
> I also see this issue with metag when I try and select
> CONFIG_GENERIC_SIGALTSTACK. Until asm-generic/syscalls.h goes away it
> seems a shame to have to keep a misleading #define sys_sigaltstack
> sys_si
On 21/12/12 06:24, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Friday 21 December 2012 05:51 AM, Al Viro wrote:
>> sigaltstack infrastructure + conversion for x86, alpha and um,
>> COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE infrastructure. Note that there are several
>> conflicts between "unify SS_ONSTACK/SS_DISABLE definitions" and
>>
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:54:08AM +0530, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On Friday 21 December 2012 05:51 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> > sigaltstack infrastructure + conversion for x86, alpha and um,
> > COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE infrastructure. Note that there are several
> > conflicts between "unify SS_ONSTACK/SS_DI
On Friday 21 December 2012 05:51 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> sigaltstack infrastructure + conversion for x86, alpha and um,
> COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE infrastructure. Note that there are several
> conflicts between "unify SS_ONSTACK/SS_DISABLE definitions" and
> UAPI patches in mainline; resolution is trivi
On Fri, 2012-10-12 at 02:09 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Anyway, if ppc folks can live with that stuff in its current form for now,
> here's the second signal.git pull request. Stuff in there: kernel_thread/
> kernel_execve/sys_execve conversions for several more architectures plus
> assorted signal fi
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 02:09:58AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
> How granular are you planning to make that? I mean, we are talking about
> 3 objects here - init/main.o, kernel/kthread.o and kernel/kmod.o. Do they
> get TOC separate from that of arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.o?
Potentially, yes, it
11 matches
Mail list logo
