Memory barriers aren't one of my strengths, but this appears correct.
Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:09 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Index: linux-2.6/fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c
> ===
> ---
Memory barriers aren't one of my strengths, but this appears correct.
Acked-by: Dave Kleikamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 12:09 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
Index: linux-2.6/fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c
===
---
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 13:47 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> I don't think the previous code was wrong... it's not a locked section
> > and we don't care about ordering previous stores. It's an
> allocation, it
> > should be fine. In general, bitmap allocators should be allright.
>
> Well if it is
On Friday 26 October 2007 13:35, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
[acks]
Thanks for those...
> > Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-powerpc/mmu_context.h
> > ===
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-powerpc/mmu_context.h
> > +++
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_native_64.c
> ===
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_native_64.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_native_64.c
> @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static inline void native_lock_hpte(stru
>
Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_native_64.c
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_native_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/mm/hash_native_64.c
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static inline void native_lock_hpte(stru
On Friday 26 October 2007 13:35, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
[acks]
Thanks for those...
Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-powerpc/mmu_context.h
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-powerpc/mmu_context.h
+++
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 13:47 +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
I don't think the previous code was wrong... it's not a locked section
and we don't care about ordering previous stores. It's an
allocation, it
should be fine. In general, bitmap allocators should be allright.
Well if it is just
8 matches
Mail list logo