Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated)

2007-07-31 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tuesday, 31 July 2007 11:16, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Dienstag 31 Juli 2007 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > > > Well, the people on linux-pm seem to agree that the .suspend() and .resume() > > callbacks are not suitable for runtime power management, so having them > > built without SUSPEND or HIB

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [PATCH 2/2] Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND (updated)

2007-07-31 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Dienstag 31 Juli 2007 schrieb Rafael J. Wysocki: > Well, the people on linux-pm seem to agree that the .suspend() and .resume() > callbacks are not suitable for runtime power management, so having them > built without SUSPEND or HIBERNATION wouldn't be very useful. ;-) These are what USB runti