Re: [lkp-robot] [iversion] c0cef30e4f: aim7.jobs-per-min -18.0% regression

2018-02-26 Thread Jeff Layton
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 06:43 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 16:38 +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote: > > On 02/25, Jeff Layton wrote: > > > On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 23:05 +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > > Greeting, > > > > > > > > FYI, we noticed a -18.0% regression of aim7.jobs-per-mi

Re: [lkp-robot] [iversion] c0cef30e4f: aim7.jobs-per-min -18.0% regression

2018-02-26 Thread Jeff Layton
On Mon, 2018-02-26 at 16:38 +0800, Ye Xiaolong wrote: > On 02/25, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 23:05 +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > Greeting, > > > > > > FYI, we noticed a -18.0% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit: > > > > > > > > > commit: c0cef30e4ff0dc025f4a1

Re: [lkp-robot] [iversion] c0cef30e4f: aim7.jobs-per-min -18.0% regression

2018-02-26 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 02/25, Jeff Layton wrote: >On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 23:05 +0800, kernel test robot wrote: >> Greeting, >> >> FYI, we noticed a -18.0% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit: >> >> >> commit: c0cef30e4ff0dc025f4a1660b8f0ba43ed58426e ("iversion: make >> inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool

Re: [lkp-robot] [iversion] c0cef30e4f: aim7.jobs-per-min -18.0% regression

2018-02-25 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 7:05 AM, kernel test robot wrote: > > FYI, we noticed a -18.0% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit: > > commit: c0cef30e4ff0dc025f4a1660b8f0ba43ed58426e ("iversion: make > inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64") That looks very unlikely. Can you d

Re: [lkp-robot] [iversion] c0cef30e4f: aim7.jobs-per-min -18.0% regression

2018-02-25 Thread Jeff Layton
On Sun, 2018-02-25 at 23:05 +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a -18.0% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit: > > > commit: c0cef30e4ff0dc025f4a1660b8f0ba43ed58426e ("iversion: make > inode_cmp_iversion{+raw} return bool instead of s64") > https://git.kerne