* Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> During the work on the x86 32 and 64 bit backtrace code I found it
> useful to have a simple test module to test a process and irq context
> backtrace. Since the existing backtrace code was buggy, I figure it
> might be useful to have such a test
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 10:04:29AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> yeah, agreed, we'll clean this all up, and move the other testcode there
> too, ok? There's rcutorture, lock-selftests, rt-tester,
> kprobes-smoke-test and now backtracetest.
>
> Arjan might as well want to use the opportunity and br
* Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:42:08PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >
> > Subject: Add a simple backtrace test module
> > From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > During the work on the x86 32 and 64 bit backtrace code I found it
> > u
On Wed, Jan 09, 2008 at 10:42:08PM -0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> Subject: Add a simple backtrace test module
> From: Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> During the work on the x86 32 and 64 bit backtrace code I found it useful
> to have a simple test module to test a process and irq con
4 matches
Mail list logo